![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I liked the book. Not a literary breakthrough and a bit telegraphed, but an entertaining and quick read. Even though I've heard the movie (understandably, considering the book is a lot of exposition) drags, I may go see it for the heck of it.
Currently, I've been half paying attention to a documentary on The History Channel called Beyond the Da Vinci Code which is uncovering the truth behind many of the so-called claims in the novel. I like the approach of this documentary. The facts are being presented neutrally. I've read so many similar debunkings that annoy me with a tone, explicit or implicit, of "Dan Brown got it wrong!"
Give me a break. He wrote a work of fiction!!
Many years ago, I fell in love with a novel called The Eight, the first book by Katherine Neville. It's still one of my favorite books. It's a creative placing of historical characters from around and after the time of the French Revolution linked to another story thread set in the 1970s. They're all where they were, doing for the most part what they did that is recorded historically, when they did it. But Neville changed their motivations, often extremely. To me, whatever his actual intent, Brown's The Da Vinci code is the same sort of thing, except only with present day protagonists.
People having cow puppies about things Brown claims in the novel about the Catholic church and so forth, IMHO, just need to get over it.
Currently, I've been half paying attention to a documentary on The History Channel called Beyond the Da Vinci Code which is uncovering the truth behind many of the so-called claims in the novel. I like the approach of this documentary. The facts are being presented neutrally. I've read so many similar debunkings that annoy me with a tone, explicit or implicit, of "Dan Brown got it wrong!"
Give me a break. He wrote a work of fiction!!
Many years ago, I fell in love with a novel called The Eight, the first book by Katherine Neville. It's still one of my favorite books. It's a creative placing of historical characters from around and after the time of the French Revolution linked to another story thread set in the 1970s. They're all where they were, doing for the most part what they did that is recorded historically, when they did it. But Neville changed their motivations, often extremely. To me, whatever his actual intent, Brown's The Da Vinci code is the same sort of thing, except only with present day protagonists.
People having cow puppies about things Brown claims in the novel about the Catholic church and so forth, IMHO, just need to get over it.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 01:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 02:08 am (UTC)I've always been fascinated by conspiracy theories, but have never bought into them. I've owned and enjoyed Steve Jackson Games' Illuminati since high school. Despite what anyone might think about Coca-Cola and the management at the time, I remember hearing an exec from that company saying about the New Coke Fiasco after it happened, in response to claims they introduced New Coke with the sole intent when it bombed of putting out Coca-Cola Classic to drive its sales even higher.
His response? "We're neither that smart, nor that stupid."
As conspiracy theories go, I think that just about sums up the reality behind many of them. :-)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 01:57 am (UTC)It's fiction. It's extremely well-written popular fiction. It's definitely translatable to the big screen. It's entertaining. It's commercial and therefore isn't so heady and esoteric that the eliterati will devour it. It seems heady and esoteric, so the less snobbish folks and the masses *will* eat it up. It's fiction. It's fun. It's even mildly thought-provoking.
I read it the other day. Enjoyable read. Then I finished an old Ludlum paperback I've been gnawing on. Now I'm reading Map of Bones. It's the week of comfortable thrillers, apparently.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 02:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 02:17 am (UTC)I'm highly amused by the upsurge in historical/archaelogical thriller fiction. It's been around for a long time, but now it's becoming popular. It gives me something to read, though, so I can't complain too much.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 03:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 10:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 02:41 am (UTC)Over the years I've grown more skeptical about the book, but keep a battered copy on hand to loan to people, just because I think it's helpful to burst through the Christian mythology so many people are raised with.
I was confused as to why the authors of "HBHG" sued Dan Brown - theirs was a work of history (accurate or not) and "The Da Vinci Code" was a work of fiction - when did it get illegal to base fiction on history?
I did read the Da Vinci Code (or, rather, listened to the audio book) and .. well, it wasn't great, it wasn't awful, I figured DB had fun building a story around an old book. But I do think that for a lot of people the Da Vinci Code was an awakening of sorts, a new way to look at old stories. The controversy never hurts popularity ratings, either :P
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 03:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 10:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 10:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 02:57 am (UTC)On the other hand, I adore Janet Evanovich's Stephanie Plum novels. So what the hell do I know? :)
Are you into English detective fiction at all? Reginald Hill is a simply gorgeous writer, and his Dalziel and Pascoe series gets better with each book.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 11:01 am (UTC)As for English detective fiction, I've only read some of the Doyle Sherlock Holmes stuff, but I'm always open to suggestions. Especially considering I am a huge anglophile. :-)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 02:38 pm (UTC)Also, try some of Ian Rankin's Inspector Rebus books. (That's Scotland, not England, though. ;) )
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 03:08 pm (UTC)That's Scotland, not England, though. ;)
Like that's a problem for me? ;-)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 09:40 pm (UTC)Now, how would I know that, I wonder? :)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 09:22 pm (UTC)Rebus is also wonderful.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 09:29 pm (UTC)Wikipedia lists the novels (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalziel_&_Pascoe) in order. I believe they're all available in paperback, except Death of Dalziel, which hasn't yet been released.
The TV series is not available in the U.S. (or in the UK, from what I can tell), damn it. Although it took, in its second season, a major departure from the books, A&E ran the very first one, A Clubbable Woman, which I saw and liked, but another has never crossed the pond, nor does it look to be happening any time soon. Ah, well.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 09:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 04:12 am (UTC)I think some of my sales girls and I will see it Monday
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 11:02 am (UTC)Since it's been a while since I read it, I'm trying to remember what those might be. I thought more that his pace was a bit choppy in places.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 03:24 pm (UTC)But both are fine entertainment. Not to be taken as anything more.
I pretty much grew up reading things like Chariots of the Gods, so this sort of genre is great brain candy to me. And I've loved how, over the years, the things that were 'explained' in Chariots have since been actually explained by further exploration... and reading about them as the scientific story unfolds (a) decade(s) after I read the book is highly entertaining...
no subject
Date: 2006-05-26 03:31 pm (UTC)