Date: 2006-05-22 12:32 pm (UTC)
Here's what I said in someone else's journal about the hoopla:

My issue with it mainly is that they're being arbitrary about it and backpedaling. I am not in the "OMG LJ is banning all nursing pics! Discrimination!!111!!!" camp. But it seems weird to me that the TOS started off saying "graphically sexual or violent" default userpics were not allowed, then changed it to "nudity or graphic violence", and then clarified it further by saying that nursing pics *are* allowed as default icons, as long as no nipple or areola is showing in the picture.

Which, okay, but there are some women who just have bigger areolas than others. Are they supposed to not post a default nursing icon because of it? And also, LJ Abuse isn't going to go hunting for these icons, so the only way they hear about it is if someone reports them. Which means all kinds of opportunity for personal vendettas to come into play here. And I understand that they don't have the time to look at a million LJ icons to see if they all comply with the TOS. But it still seems arbitrary to me.

That said, a lot of the boob_nazis are so up in arms about it that they're threatening to leave LJ over it. I'm definitely not going to do that. I don't care *that* much. :)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

quasigeostrophy: (Default)
quasigeostrophy

October 2019

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 04:13 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios